Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs NPFCX
FWCFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs NPFCX
FWCFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a StrongBuy and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWCFX (4.16B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWCFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWCFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. NPFCX (6.26). FWCFX (8.86) and NPFCX (8.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWCFX | NPFCX | FWCFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.47 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.47 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.841 | 4.931 | 402% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.16B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.32 | 6.26 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.86 | 30.32 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.86 | 8.52 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 96.35 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement