Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs NPFCX
FWCFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs NPFCX
FWCFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWCFX (4B). NPFCX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: NPFCX (0.33) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWCFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.47). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWCFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.62 vs. NPFCX (12.12). FWCFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.52 vs. NPFCX (11.16).
| FWCFX | NPFCX | FWCFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.47 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.47 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.173 | 6.075 | 381% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.62 | 12.12 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.18 | 37.44 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | 11.16 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.60 | 111.02 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement