Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$31.99
Change+$0.32 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$66.34
Change+$0.41 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FWCFX (3.08B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.51) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. FWCFX (-9.05). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.46 vs. FWCFX (13.15).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.596 | 8.915 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 150B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.05 | 9.22 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.83 | 28.62 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.15 | 43.46 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.22 | 77.25 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement