Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.26
Change-$0.44 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$71.01
Change-$0.62 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWCFX (3.57B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.46) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. FWCFX (-2.54). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.64 vs. FWCFX (8.84).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.053 | 16.582 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 12.11 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.34 | 46.17 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.84 | 26.64 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 87.22 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers