Ad is loading...
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$28.90
Change+$0.40 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$59.92
Change+$1.14 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FWCFX (2.95B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.56) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.19 vs. FWCFX (-12.15). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.19 vs. FWCFX (16.76).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.546 | -1.625 | 649% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.15 | 4.19 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.57 | 11.37 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.76 | 47.19 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.79 | 56.16 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...