Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$34.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$69.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FWCFX (3.28B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.49) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.94 vs. FWCFX (2.99). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.27 vs. FWCFX (18.20).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.76 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.040 | 14.628 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 158B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 16.94 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 44.81 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.20 | 42.27 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.45 | 85.67 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement