Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWCFX (4B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.93) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.62 vs. RNPEX (13.27). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 15.70 vs. FWCFX (13.52).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.75 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.75 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.173 | 6.434 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.62 | 13.27 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.18 | 41.47 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | 15.70 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.60 | 122.92 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement