Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPEX
FWCFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWCFX (3.93B). RNPEX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPEX (0.93) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWCFX (18 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPEX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. RNPEX (3.88). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.38 vs. FWCFX (-0.03).
| FWCFX | RNPEX | FWCFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.75 | 243% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.75 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.674 | 6.550 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 3.88 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 39.58 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.03 | 10.38 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.30 | 109.34 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement