Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$34.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FWCFX (3.28B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.74) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.38 vs. FWCFX (2.99). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. FWCFX (18.20).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.040 | 14.829 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 158B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 17.38 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.33 | 45.93 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.20 | 44.12 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.45 | 88.70 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement