Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$31.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$65.98
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FWCFX (2.91B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.82) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FWCFX (-9.58). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.94 vs. FWCFX (18.07).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.793 | 6.351 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.58 | 7.83 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 31.51 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.07 | 51.94 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.68 | 71.32 | 43% |