Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.26
Change-$0.44 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.52
Change-$0.63 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWCFX (3.57B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. FWCFX (-2.54). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.29 vs. FWCFX (8.84).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.053 | 16.892 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.69 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 12.54 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.34 | 47.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.84 | 28.29 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 90.23 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement