Ad is loading...
FWCFX vs RNPFX
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$26.52
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$54.85
Change-$0.67 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.29B
FWCFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. FWCFX (2.95B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPFX (0.84) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.46 vs. FWCFX (-19.99). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.81 vs. FWCFX (25.11).
| FWCFX | RNPFX | FWCFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.46 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.321 | -10.509 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 125B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.99 | -6.46 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.87 | -5.35 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.11 | 53.81 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.16 | 48.56 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...