Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.26
Change-$0.44 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$72.68
Change-$0.64 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Hold and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FWCFX (3.57B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPGX (0.73) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. FWCFX (-2.54). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.52 vs. FWCFX (8.84).
| FWCFX | RNPGX | FWCFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.053 | 16.943 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 160B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.54 | 12.60 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.34 | 47.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.84 | 28.52 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.96 | 90.63 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement