Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$31.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$66.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPGX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FWCFX (2.91B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPGX (0.88) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. FWCFX (-9.58). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 52.22 vs. FWCFX (18.07).
| FWCFX | RNPGX | FWCFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.793 | 6.372 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.58 | 7.89 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | 31.64 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.07 | 52.22 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.68 | 71.69 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement