Ad is loading...
FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$28.90
Change+$0.40 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$61.20
Change+$1.16 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FWCFX (2.95B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPGX (0.89) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWCFX (16 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. FWCFX (-12.15). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.35 vs. FWCFX (16.76).
| FWCFX | RNPGX | FWCFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.546 | -1.529 | 690% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.89 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.15 | 4.63 | -262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.57 | 12.33 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.76 | 49.35 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.79 | 58.98 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...