Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPGX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$35.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$74.20
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a StrongBuy and RNPGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWCFX (3.51B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPGX (0.75) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWCFX (17 years) vs RNPGX (16 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPGX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.95 vs. FWCFX (-2.33). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.48 vs. FWCFX (10.92).
| FWCFX | RNPGX | FWCFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.41 | 422% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.183 | 19.163 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | 12.95 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.41 | 62.39 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.92 | 36.48 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.07 | 100.76 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement