Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison
Open Charts FWCFX vs RNPGX
FWCFX vs RNPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWCFX vs. RNPGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWCFX is a Buy and RNPGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWCFX (3.93B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: RNPGX (1.23) vs FWCFX (0.00). FWCFX was incepted earlier than RNPGX: FWCFX (18 years) vs RNPGX (17 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPGX: FWCFX (0) vs RNPGX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. RNPGX (4.37). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 12.40 vs. FWCFX (-0.03).
| FWCFX | RNPGX | FWCFX / RNPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.40 | 455% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.40 | 455% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.674 | 6.820 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 169B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 4.37 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 41.47 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.03 | 12.40 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.30 | 114.00 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement