Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCGX vs RWIHX
FWCGX vs RWIHX Comparison
Open Charts FWCGX vs RWIHX
FWCGX vs RWIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCGX (160B) and RWIHX (160B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FWCGX pays higher dividends than RWIHX: FWCGX (1.57) vs RWIHX (1.49). FWCGX was incepted earlier than RWIHX: FWCGX (6 years) vs RWIHX (11 years). RWIHX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FWCGX (0.46). FWCGX (44.00) and RWIHX (44.00) have comparable annual turnover. FWCGX (250) and RWIHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWCGX (22.25) and RWIHX (22.09) have marching annual gain over last year. FWCGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.26 vs. RWIHX (36.49).
| FWCGX | RWIHX | FWCGX / RWIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.56 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.56 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.808 | 15.739 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 160B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.49 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.25 | 22.09 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.69 | 54.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.26 | 36.49 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers