Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWCGX vs TNBRX
FWCGX vs TNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FWCGX vs TNBRX
FWCGX vs TNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCGX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TNBRX (285M). FWCGX pays higher dividends than TNBRX: FWCGX (1.58) vs TNBRX (0.34). FWCGX was incepted earlier than TNBRX: FWCGX (6 years) vs TNBRX (12 years). TNBRX (1.58) is less costly to investors than FWCGX (0.46). FWCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBRX (33.00). TNBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCGX: TNBRX (0) vs FWCGX (250). FWCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. TNBRX (6.58). FWCGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. TNBRX (28.35).
| FWCGX | TNBRX | FWCGX / TNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.35 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.58 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.422 | 4.839 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 285M | 55,439% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.34 | 461% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | 6.58 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 35.36 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.97 | 28.35 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers