Ad is loading...
FWD vs TMFG
FWD vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TMFG
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$71.32
Change+$0.51 (+0.72%)
Volume$350
Net Assets536.61M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$27.93
Change+$0.21 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.79M
FWD vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TMFG commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 537M vs. TMFG (378M). TMFG has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: TMFG (-2.146) vs FWD (-10.582). FWD was incepted earlier than TMFG: FWD (2 years) vs TMFG (11 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). FWD has a higher turnover TMFG (38.00) vs TMFG (38.00).
| FWD | TMFG | FWD / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | -10.582 | -2.146 | 493% |
| Net Assets | 537M | 378M | 142% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 | 76% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 38.00 | 429% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| EQIX - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||