Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TMFG
FWD vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TMFG
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$91.42
Change+$1.25 (+1.39%)
Volume$126
Net Assets838.4M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$30.18
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
Volume$400
Net Assets396.98M
FWD vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TMFG commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Buy and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 838M vs. TMFG (397M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: FWD (13.865) vs TMFG (5.718). FWD was incepted earlier than TMFG: FWD (2 years) vs TMFG (11 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). FWD has a higher turnover TMFG (38.00) vs TMFG (38.00).
| FWD | TMFG | FWD / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 13.865 | 5.718 | 242% |
| Net Assets | 838M | 397M | 211% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 | 76% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 38.00 | 429% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.53% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| SNEX - TMFG | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||