Ad is loading...
FWD vs TMFG
FWD vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TMFG
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$83.11
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
Volume$79.49K
Net Assets539.75M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$28.80
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Volume$30.31K
Net Assets406.21M
FWD vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TMFG commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 540M vs. TMFG (406M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: FWD (4.950) vs TMFG (1.659). FWD was incepted earlier than TMFG: FWD (2 years) vs TMFG (11 years). FWD has a higher turnover TMFG (4.00) vs TMFG (4.00).
| FWD | TMFG | FWD / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 4.950 | 1.659 | 298% |
| Net Assets | 540M | 406M | 133% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 4.00 | 2,250% |
| Yield | N/A | 0.33 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| EQIX - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||