Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs TMFG
FWD vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs TMFG
FWD vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. TMFG commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.18B vs. TMFG (343M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: FWD (22.172) vs TMFG (2.566). FWD was incepted earlier than TMFG: FWD (3 years) vs TMFG (12 years). FWD (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). FWD has a higher turnover TMFG (15.00) vs TMFG (15.00).
| FWD | TMFG | FWD / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 22.172 | 2.566 | 864% |
| Net Assets | 3.18B | 343M | 927% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 | 76% |
| Turnover | 196.00 | 15.00 | 1,307% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.26 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +4.59% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| COHR - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +3.60% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| JLL - TMFG | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| PYPL - TMFG | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| PAYC - TMFG | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| MDT - TMFG | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
| RMD - TMFG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||