Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWDGX vs RNWEX
FWDGX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FWDGX vs RNWEX
FWDGX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWDGX vs. RNWEX commentary
Sep 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWDGX is a Hold and RNWEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FWDGX (2.64B). FWDGX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: FWDGX (1.64) vs RNWEX (0.97). FWDGX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FWDGX (6 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FWDGX (0.83). FWDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FWDGX (250) and RNWEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.16 vs. RNWEX (20.31). FWDGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.55 vs. RNWEX (15.65).
| FWDGX | RNWEX | FWDGX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.92 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.92 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.065 | 16.047 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.97 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.16 | 20.31 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.15 | 50.92 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.55 | 15.65 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement