Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWDGX vs RNWHX
FWDGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FWDGX vs RNWHX
FWDGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWDGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWDGX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FWDGX (2.64B). FWDGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FWDGX (1.64) vs RNWHX (1.15). FWDGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FWDGX (6 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FWDGX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FWDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FWDGX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.16 vs. RNWHX (20.53). FWDGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.55 vs. RNWHX (16.46).
| FWDGX | RNWHX | FWDGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.72 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.065 | 16.208 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 88.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.15 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.16 | 20.53 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.15 | 51.74 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.55 | 16.46 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement