RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FWDGX (2.64B). FWDGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FWDGX (1.68) vs RNWHX (1.17). FWDGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FWDGX (6 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FWDGX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FWDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FWDGX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FWDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.63 vs. RNWHX (19.97). FWDGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.47 vs. RNWHX (17.54).

	FWDGX	RNWHX	FWDGX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	0.83	0.72	115%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.83	0.72	115%
Fund Existence	6 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	17.031	15.360	111%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	250	100%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	2.64B	88.6B	3%
Annual Yield % from dividends	1.68	1.17	144%
Returns for 1 year	29.63	19.97	148%
Returns for 3 years	67.92	50.24	135%
Returns for 5 years	35.47	17.54	202%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	105.71	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
CGIOX	56.98	0.24	+0.42%
Calamos Growth and Income R6
JDBAX	50.69	0.17	+0.34%
Janus Henderson Balanced A
LMCQX	37.15	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
RREAX	31.28	N/A	N/A
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs A
HUSIX	33.26	N/A	N/A
Huber Small Cap Value Inv