FWFW
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.41 (-70.69%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.03M
NTCYF
Price
$42.85
Change
+$2.15 (+5.28%)
Updated
Mar 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWFW vs NTCYF

Header iconFWFW vs NTCYF Comparison
Open Charts FWFW vs NTCYFBanner chart's image
Flywheel Advanced Technology
Price$0.17
Change-$0.41 (-70.69%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.03M
Netcompany Group AS
Price$42.85
Change+$2.15 (+5.28%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.81B
FWFW vs NTCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWFW vs. NTCYF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWFW is a Hold and NTCYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FWFW: $0.17 vs. NTCYF: $42.85)
Brand notoriety: FWFW and NTCYF are both not notable
FWFW represents the Financial Conglomerates, while NTCYF is part of the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWFW: 69% vs. NTCYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FWFW: $5.03M vs. NTCYF: $1.81B
FWFW [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $5.03M. NTCYF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $231.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWFW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTCYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FWFW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTCYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTCYF is a better buy in the long-term than FWFW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWFW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FWFW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FWFW (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -70.67% price change this week, while NTCYF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

@Information Technology Services (+1.44% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCYF($1.81B) has a higher market cap than FWFW($5.03M). NTCYF has higher P/E ratio than FWFW: NTCYF (27.37) vs FWFW (1.31). NTCYF YTD gains are higher at: 2.341 vs. FWFW (-14.950). NTCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. FWFW (-62.38K). NTCYF has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FWFW (440K). FWFW has less debt than NTCYF: FWFW (544K) vs NTCYF (3.43B). NTCYF has higher revenues than FWFW: NTCYF (6.75B) vs FWFW (0).
FWFWNTCYFFWFW / NTCYF
Capitalization5.03M1.81B0%
EBITDA-62.38K1.01B-0%
Gain YTD-14.9502.341-639%
P/E Ratio1.3127.375%
Revenue06.75B-
Total Cash440K1.14B0%
Total Debt544K3.43B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FWFW: Fundamental Ratings
FWFW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWFWNTCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWFW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TROW111.526.15
+5.84%
T Rowe Price Group
IMTX5.720.27
+4.95%
Immatics NV
GAIA5.660.15
+2.72%
Gaia
PRM22.280.27
+1.23%
Perimeter Solutions Inc
MRM1.44-0.12
-7.69%
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies

FWFW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWFW and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWFW and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWFW
1D Price
Change %
FWFW100%
N/A
CCCMF - FWFW
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APMRF - FWFW
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTCYF - FWFW
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - FWFW
11%
Poorly correlated
-13.23%
KD - FWFW
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
More

NTCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTCYF and FWFW have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTCYF and FWFW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTCYF
1D Price
Change %
NTCYF100%
N/A
FWFW - NTCYF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KD - NTCYF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
ARBB - NTCYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
FCCN - NTCYF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
APMRF - NTCYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More