Advertisement
FWFW vs NTCYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWFW is a Hold and NTCYF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FWFW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTCYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FWFW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTCYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FWFW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FWFW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FWFW (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +154.00% price change this week, while NTCYF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +4.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.55%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+4.62% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Information Technology Services (-0.10% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| FWFW | NTCYF | FWFW / NTCYF | |
| Capitalization | 17.4M | 1.76B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -113.55K | 1.1B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 193.750 | 2.341 | 8,278% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.52 | 27.37 | 17% |
| Revenue | 0 | 6.69B | - |
| Total Cash | 440K | 185M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 544K | 2.46B | 0% |
FWFW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FWFW | NTCYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 9% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 6% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
Advertisement
FWFW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FWFW and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWFW and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWFW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWFW | 100% | N/A | ||
| CCCMF - FWFW | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APMRF - FWFW | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTCYF - FWFW | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NOTE - FWFW | 11% Poorly correlated | -3.01% | ||
| KD - FWFW | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
NTCYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTCYF and FWFW have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTCYF and FWFW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTCYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTCYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FWFW - NTCYF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KD - NTCYF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ARBB - NTCYF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| FCCN - NTCYF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| APMRF - NTCYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||