Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWGIX vs TROCX
FWGIX vs TROCX Comparison
Open Charts FWGIX vs TROCX
FWGIX vs TROCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWGIX vs. TROCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWGIX is a Buy and TROCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWGIX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. TROCX (1.42B). FWGIX pays higher dividends than TROCX: FWGIX (1.61) vs TROCX (1.05). FWGIX was incepted earlier than TROCX: FWGIX (9 years) vs TROCX (11 years). TROCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FWGIX (0.41). FWGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TROCX (22.00). TROCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWGIX: TROCX (500000) vs FWGIX (1000000). TROCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. FWGIX (17.04). FWGIX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. TROCX (33.70).
| FWGIX | TROCX | FWGIX / TROCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.86 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.90 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.271 | 12.916 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.42B | 11,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 1.05 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.04 | 18.36 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.10 | 64.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 33.70 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement