Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs NPFCX
FWIFX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs NPFCX
FWIFX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWIFX (4B). FWIFX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: FWIFX (0.46) vs NPFCX (0.33). FWIFX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: FWIFX (17 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FWIFX (0.81). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. NPFCX (23.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPFCX: FWIFX (0) vs NPFCX (250). FWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. NPFCX (12.12). FWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.18 vs. NPFCX (11.16).
| FWIFX | NPFCX | FWIFX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.719 | 6.075 | 390% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.33 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.12 | 12.12 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 37.44 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.18 | 11.16 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.43 | 111.02 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers