Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPCX
FWIFX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPCX
FWIFX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWIFX (3.91B). RNPCX pays higher dividends than FWIFX: RNPCX (0.71) vs FWIFX (0.47). FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: FWIFX (17 years) vs RNPCX (24 years). RNPCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FWIFX (0.81). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPCX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPCX (250). FWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. RNPCX (6.23). FWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.15 vs. RNPCX (10.33).
| FWIFX | RNPCX | FWIFX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.05 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.05 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.312 | 4.726 | 324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.71 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 6.23 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.05 | 31.95 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.15 | 10.33 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.14 | 101.14 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement