Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide I
Price$33.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$65.98
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.5B
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FWIFX (2.91B). FWIFX (0.84) and RNPFX (0.82) have matching dividends . FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWIFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWIFX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FWIFX (-7.90). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.94 vs. FWIFX (25.83).
| FWIFX | RNPFX | FWIFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.46 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.46 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.436 | 6.351 | -38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 148B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.82 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.90 | 7.83 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.27 | 31.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.83 | 51.94 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.28 | 71.32 | 61% |