Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. FWIFX (3.91B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWIFX: RNPFX (1.21) vs FWIFX (0.47). FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWIFX (18 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWIFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. RNPFX (9.17). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. FWIFX (11.45).
| FWIFX | RNPFX | FWIFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.952 | 8.293 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 166B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.21 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | 9.17 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.99 | 45.34 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.45 | 17.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.13 | 112.03 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers