Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWIFX (4B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWIFX: RNPFX (1.18) vs FWIFX (0.46). FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWIFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWIFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.12 vs. RNPFX (13.73). FWIFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.18 vs. RNPFX (17.55).
| FWIFX | RNPFX | FWIFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.719 | 6.578 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4B | 172B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.18 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.12 | 13.73 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 43.12 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.18 | 17.55 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.43 | 127.31 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement