Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWIFX vs RNPFX
FWIFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWIFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWIFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWIFX (3.91B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWIFX: RNPFX (1.21) vs FWIFX (0.47). FWIFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWIFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWIFX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). FWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). FWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWIFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). FWIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. RNPFX (7.04). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.76 vs. FWIFX (12.15).
| FWIFX | RNPFX | FWIFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.45 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.312 | 5.075 | 302% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.91B | 170B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.21 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 7.04 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.05 | 34.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.15 | 13.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.14 | 108.85 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement