Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMIX vs PPSFX
FWMIX vs PPSFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMIX vs PPSFX
FWMIX vs PPSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMIX vs. PPSFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMIX is a Hold and PPSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMIX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. PPSFX (2.28B). FWMIX pays higher dividends than PPSFX: FWMIX (1.45) vs PPSFX (1.01). FWMIX was incepted earlier than PPSFX: FWMIX (9 years) vs PPSFX (26 years). PPSFX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FWMIX (0.26). PPSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.50 vs. FWMIX (29.00). PPSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMIX: PPSFX (0) vs FWMIX (1000000). FWMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. PPSFX (2.24). FWMIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.97 vs. PPSFX (-1.37).
| FWMIX | PPSFX | FWMIX / PPSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.24 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 1.27 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.605 | 8.342 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 2.28B | 9,398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.01 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 2.24 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.31 | 17.58 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.97 | -1.37 | -1,973% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement