Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GGGPX
FWMMX vs GGGPX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GGGPX
FWMMX vs GGGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GGGPX (1.56B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: FWMMX (1.37) vs GGGPX (0.22). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GGGPX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GGGPX (8 years). GGGPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: GGGPX (0) vs FWMMX (250). GGGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. FWMMX (7.00). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.91 vs. GGGPX (25.87).
| FWMMX | GGGPX | FWMMX / GGGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 10.177 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.56B | 13,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.22 | 630% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 13.42 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 44.02 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 25.87 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement