Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GSCGX
FWMMX vs GSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GSCGX
FWMMX vs GSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. GSCGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and GSCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSCGX (1.56B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: FWMMX (1.38) vs GSCGX (0.03). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GSCGX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GSCGX (36 years). GSCGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: FWMMX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. GSCGX (1.93). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. GSCGX (10.91).
| FWMMX | GSCGX | FWMMX / GSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.00 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 11.544 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.56B | 14,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.03 | 4,785% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 1.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 34.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 10.91 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers