Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GSPFX
FWMMX vs GSPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GSPFX
FWMMX vs GSPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSPFX (26.3M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GSPFX: FWMMX (1.37) vs GSPFX (0.47). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GSPFX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GSPFX (9 years). GSPFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPFX: FWMMX (250) vs GSPFX (5000). GSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.38 vs. FWMMX (7.00). GSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.16 vs. FWMMX (28.91).
| FWMMX | GSPFX | FWMMX / GSPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.50 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 10.376 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 26.3M | 828,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.47 | 292% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 16.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 44.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 37.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement