Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GSPFX
FWMMX vs GSPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GSPFX
FWMMX vs GSPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSPFX (26.9M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GSPFX: FWMMX (1.41) vs GSPFX (0.48). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GSPFX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GSPFX (10 years). GSPFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPFX: FWMMX (250) vs GSPFX (5000). GSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. FWMMX (5.72). GSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.15 vs. FWMMX (30.58).
| FWMMX | GSPFX | FWMMX / GSPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.50 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 12.176 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 26.9M | 814,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.48 | 296% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 12.70 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 41.66 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 35.15 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement