Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GSSQX
FWMMX vs GSSQX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GSSQX
FWMMX vs GSSQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. GSSQX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and GSSQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSSQX (1.14B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GSSQX: FWMMX (1.38) vs GSSQX (0.22). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GSSQX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GSSQX (35 years). GSSQX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GSSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSSQX: FWMMX (250) vs GSSQX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. GSSQX (0.39). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. GSSQX (0.04).
| FWMMX | GSSQX | FWMMX / GSSQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.92 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.96 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 8.158 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.14B | 19,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.22 | 625% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 0.39 | 530% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 29.97 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 0.04 | 80,769% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers