Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs GSURX
FWMMX vs GSURX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs GSURX
FWMMX vs GSURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSURX (1.15B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than GSURX: FWMMX (1.41) vs GSURX (0.06). FWMMX was incepted earlier than GSURX: FWMMX (6 years) vs GSURX (19 years). GSURX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). GSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). GSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: GSURX (0) vs FWMMX (250). GSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. FWMMX (5.72). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. GSURX (-0.08).
| FWMMX | GSURX | FWMMX / GSURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.21 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 8.305 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.15B | 19,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.06 | 2,328% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 6.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 27.10 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -0.08 | -38,267% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement