Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs HCACX
FWMMX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs HCACX
FWMMX vs HCACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HCACX (6.21B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FWMMX (1.39) vs HCACX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FWMMX (6 years) vs HCACX (28 years). HCACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FWMMX (250) vs HCACX (2000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. HCACX (2.53). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.93 vs. HCACX (-21.02).
| FWMMX | HCACX | FWMMX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.86 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.86 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.588 | 8.529 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.21B | 3,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 2.53 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 17.61 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.93 | -21.02 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement