Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs HCACX
FWMMX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs HCACX
FWMMX vs HCACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. HCACX (6.29B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FWMMX (1.41) vs HCACX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FWMMX (6 years) vs HCACX (28 years). HCACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FWMMX (250) vs HCACX (2000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. HCACX (3.38). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. HCACX (-20.11).
| FWMMX | HCACX | FWMMX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.86 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.86 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 8.405 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.29B | 3,482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 3.38 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 12.86 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -20.11 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement