Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs HIBSX
FWMMX vs HIBSX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs HIBSX
FWMMX vs HIBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. HIBSX (1.18B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than HIBSX: FWMMX (1.37) vs HIBSX (0.81). FWMMX was incepted earlier than HIBSX: FWMMX (6 years) vs HIBSX (28 years). HIBSX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). HIBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). HIBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: HIBSX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. HIBSX (-6.34). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.24 vs. HIBSX (-4.81).
| FWMMX | HIBSX | FWMMX / HIBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.77 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 2.060 | 269% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 1.18B | 18,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.81 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | -6.34 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 2.82 | 1,168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | -4.81 | -608% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers