Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs HLSCX
FWMMX vs HLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs HLSCX
FWMMX vs HLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. HLSCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and HLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HLSCX (2.98B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than HLSCX: FWMMX (1.38) vs HLSCX (0.06). FWMMX was incepted earlier than HLSCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs HLSCX (6 years). HLSCX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). HLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). HLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: HLSCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. HLSCX (-2.29). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. HLSCX (10.82).
| FWMMX | HLSCX | FWMMX / HLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | -4.354 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 2.98B | 7,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.06 | 2,504% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -2.29 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 26.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 10.82 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers