Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs KCXIX
FWMMX vs KCXIX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs KCXIX
FWMMX vs KCXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. KCXIX (367M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: FWMMX (1.37) vs KCXIX (0.81). FWMMX was incepted earlier than KCXIX: FWMMX (6 years) vs KCXIX (6 years). KCXIX (0.46) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (13.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: FWMMX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.19 vs. FWMMX (8.50). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 79.75 vs. FWMMX (32.69).
| FWMMX | KCXIX | FWMMX / KCXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.46 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 11.355 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 367M | 59,401% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.81 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.50 | 25.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.36 | 68.46 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 79.75 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GERCX | 14.74 | 0.46 | +3.22% |
| Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts C | |||
| ESCKX | 19.86 | 0.49 | +2.54% |
| 1290 Essex Small Cap Growth R | |||
| TIQRX | 52.59 | 0.59 | +1.13% |
| Nuveen Equity Index R | |||
| PIEQX | 22.06 | 0.18 | +0.82% |
| T. Rowe Price International Eq Index | |||
| VGISX | 38.20 | 0.12 | +0.32% |
| Virtus Duff & Phelps Glb Rl Estt Secs I | |||