Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs LCIAX
FWMMX vs LCIAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs LCIAX
FWMMX vs LCIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. LCIAX (1.92B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than LCIAX: FWMMX (1.41) vs LCIAX (1.05). FWMMX was incepted earlier than LCIAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs LCIAX (24 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LCIAX (16.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: FWMMX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). LCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.62 vs. FWMMX (5.72). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. LCIAX (-1.12).
| FWMMX | LCIAX | FWMMX / LCIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.13 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 11.231 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.92B | 11,383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.05 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 6.62 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 19.78 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -1.12 | -2,738% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement