Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs LCIAX
FWMMX vs LCIAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs LCIAX
FWMMX vs LCIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCIAX (1.91B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than LCIAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs LCIAX (1.05). FWMMX was incepted earlier than LCIAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs LCIAX (24 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LCIAX (16.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: FWMMX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). LCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.58 vs. FWMMX (8.10). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. LCIAX (0.34).
| FWMMX | LCIAX | FWMMX / LCIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.04 | 875% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.13 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 9.984 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.91B | 11,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.05 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 10.58 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 23.21 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 0.34 | 8,934% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement