Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs MCSSX
FWMMX vs MCSSX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs MCSSX
FWMMX vs MCSSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MCSSX (345M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than MCSSX: FWMMX (1.37) vs MCSSX (0.07). FWMMX was incepted earlier than MCSSX: FWMMX (6 years) vs MCSSX (18 years). MCSSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. MCSSX (15.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSSX: FWMMX (250) vs MCSSX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. MCSSX (-4.60). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. MCSSX (12.42).
| FWMMX | MCSSX | FWMMX / MCSSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.16 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.16 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 1.845 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 345M | 63,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.07 | 2,031% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | -4.60 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 21.71 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 12.42 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement