Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs MRGCX
FWMMX vs MRGCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs MRGCX
FWMMX vs MRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. MRGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and MRGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. MRGCX (6.38B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than MRGCX: FWMMX (1.38) vs MRGCX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than MRGCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs MRGCX (30 years). MRGCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). MRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRGCX: FWMMX (250) vs MRGCX (1000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. MRGCX (-6.09). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. MRGCX (2.43).
| FWMMX | MRGCX | FWMMX / MRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.63 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 8.734 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.38B | 3,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -6.09 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 18.91 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 2.43 | 1,230% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement