Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSLX
FWMMX vs NBSLX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSLX
FWMMX vs NBSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NBSLX (4.82B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSLX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NBSLX (0.02). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSLX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSLX (19 years). NBSLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSLX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSLX: FWMMX (250) vs NBSLX (1000000). NBSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.31 vs. FWMMX (5.72). NBSLX return over 5 years is better than : 35.66 vs. FWMMX (30.58).
| FWMMX | NBSLX | FWMMX / NBSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 16.324 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.82B | 4,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.02 | 7,342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 26.31 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 61.47 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 35.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement