Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSLX
FWMMX vs NBSLX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSLX
FWMMX vs NBSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSLX (4.74B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSLX: FWMMX (1.39) vs NBSLX (0.02). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSLX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSLX (19 years). NBSLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBSLX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSLX: FWMMX (250) vs NBSLX (1000000). NBSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.08 vs. FWMMX (7.49). NBSLX (32.45) and FWMMX (31.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWMMX | NBSLX | FWMMX / NBSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.69 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.588 | 15.090 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.74B | 4,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.02 | 7,045% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 24.08 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 63.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.93 | 32.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement