Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSRX (4.75B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NBSRX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSRX (32 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: FWMMX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. FWMMX (7.00). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. FWMMX (28.91).
| FWMMX | NBSRX | FWMMX / NBSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 14.503 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.75B | 4,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 29.57 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 63.89 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 36.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement