Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NBSRX (4.66B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NBSRX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSRX (32 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: FWMMX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.72 vs. FWMMX (5.75). NBSRX (31.89) and FWMMX (31.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWMMX | NBSRX | FWMMX / NBSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.915 | 13.645 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.66B | 4,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 22.72 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.51 | 56.29 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.12 | 31.89 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement