Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSRX
FWMMX vs NBSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NBSRX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Hold and NBSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSRX (4.7B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NBSRX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSRX (33 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: FWMMX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.97 vs. FWMMX (1.28). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.62 vs. FWMMX (28.96).
| FWMMX | NBSRX | FWMMX / NBSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.358 | 15.538 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.7B | 4,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 19.97 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.86 | 60.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.96 | 33.62 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.48 | - |