Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSTX
FWMMX vs NBSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSTX
FWMMX vs NBSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NBSTX (4.25B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSTX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NBSTX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSTX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSTX (29 years). NBSTX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSTX (10.00). NBSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NBSTX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NBSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.65 vs. FWMMX (8.07). NBSTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.16 vs. FWMMX (29.24).
| FWMMX | NBSTX | FWMMX / NBSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.04 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 11.113 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.25B | 5,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 24.65 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 60.09 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 31.16 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement