Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NBSTX
FWMMX vs NBSTX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NBSTX
FWMMX vs NBSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSTX (4.91B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NBSTX: FWMMX (1.39) vs NBSTX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NBSTX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NBSTX (29 years). NBSTX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBSTX (10.00). NBSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NBSTX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NBSTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.05 vs. FWMMX (7.66). FWMMX (32.04) and NBSTX (31.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWMMX | NBSTX | FWMMX / NBSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.04 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.484 | 16.598 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.91B | 4,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 25.05 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 62.63 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.04 | 31.88 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement