Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NMUAX
FWMMX vs NMUAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NMUAX
FWMMX vs NMUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NMUAX (249M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NMUAX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NMUAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NMUAX (17 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). NMUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: FWMMX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. FWMMX (7.00). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.91 vs. NMUAX (-29.26).
| FWMMX | NMUAX | FWMMX / NMUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | 4.733 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 249M | 87,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 16.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 22.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | -29.26 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -16.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement