Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRACX
FWMMX vs NRACX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRACX
FWMMX vs NRACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NRACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NRACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRACX (4.71B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRACX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NRACX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRACX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRACX (17 years). NRACX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRACX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: FWMMX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.13 vs. FWMMX (2.05). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NRACX (25.60).
| FWMMX | NRACX | FWMMX / NRACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 14.910 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.71B | 4,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 19.13 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 55.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 25.60 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers