Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRACX
FWMMX vs NRACX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRACX
FWMMX vs NRACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRACX (4.75B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRACX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NRACX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRACX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRACX (17 years). NRACX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRACX (10.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: FWMMX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.56 vs. FWMMX (11.27). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.71 vs. NRACX (27.18).
| FWMMX | NRACX | FWMMX / NRACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.039 | 13.245 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.75B | 4,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 24.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.30 | 56.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.71 | 27.18 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.87 | - |