Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRARX
FWMMX vs NRARX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRARX
FWMMX vs NRARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRARX (4.75B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRARX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NRARX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRARX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRARX (17 years). NRARX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRARX (10.00). NRARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NRARX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NRARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. FWMMX (8.10). NRARX return over 5 years is better than : 33.43 vs. FWMMX (30.10).
| FWMMX | NRARX | FWMMX / NRARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 14.257 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.75B | 4,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 28.95 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 61.51 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 33.43 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement