Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRARX
FWMMX vs NRARX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRARX
FWMMX vs NRARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NRARX (4.69B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRARX: FWMMX (1.39) vs NRARX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRARX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRARX (17 years). NRARX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRARX (10.00). NRARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NRARX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NRARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. FWMMX (6.98). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. NRARX (26.85).
| FWMMX | NRARX | FWMMX / NRARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.996 | 13.315 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.69B | 4,672% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 21.74 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 53.38 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.36 | 26.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement