Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRSRX (4.74B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: FWMMX (1.39) vs NRSRX (0.11). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRSRX (13 years). NRSRX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NRSRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.19 vs. FWMMX (7.49). NRSRX (33.06) and FWMMX (31.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWMMX | NRSRX | FWMMX / NRSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.588 | 15.165 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.74B | 4,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.11 | 1,283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 24.19 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 64.37 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.93 | 33.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement