Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NRSRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NRSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRSRX (4.71B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NRSRX (0.11). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRSRX (14 years). NRSRX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NRSRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.73 vs. FWMMX (2.05). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. FWMMX (29.94).
| FWMMX | NRSRX | FWMMX / NRSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 15.880 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.71B | 4,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.11 | 1,298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 20.73 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 61.86 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 34.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers