Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NRSRX
FWMMX vs NRSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NRSRX (4.82B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NRSRX (0.11). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NRSRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NRSRX (13 years). NRSRX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: NRSRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.43 vs. FWMMX (5.72). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. FWMMX (30.58).
| FWMMX | NRSRX | FWMMX / NRSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 16.381 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.82B | 4,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.11 | 1,337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 26.43 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 61.92 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 36.27 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement