Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NSBAX (6.47B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NSBAX (0.84). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. NSBAX (0.23). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.24 vs. NSBAX (25.33).
| FWMMX | NSBAX | FWMMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.546 | 0.462 | 1,200% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 6.47B | 3,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.84 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 0.23 | 3,572% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 23.38 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 25.33 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement