Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NSBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NSBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBAX (6.18B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NSBAX (0.76). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. NSBAX (-6.11). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NSBAX (22.39).
| FWMMX | NSBAX | FWMMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 1.039 | 430% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.76 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -6.11 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 20.43 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 22.39 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.77 | - |