Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBAX
FWMMX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBAX (6.4B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NSBAX (0.79). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. NSBAX (-2.66). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.46 vs. NSBAX (23.88).
| FWMMX | NSBAX | FWMMX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.946 | 0.974 | 405% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.4B | 3,408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.79 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | -2.66 | -250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.49 | 20.08 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.46 | 23.88 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSIQX | 23.16 | 0.40 | +1.76% |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R | |||
| MFWCX | 18.29 | 0.19 | +1.05% |
| MFS Global Total Return C | |||
| ARTQX | 15.71 | 0.15 | +0.96% |
| Artisan Mid Cap Value Investor | |||
| TORCX | 21.90 | 0.18 | +0.83% |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C | |||
| ESCFX | 19.94 | -0.60 | -2.94% |
| 1290 Essex Small Cap Growth A | |||