Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NSBCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBCX (6.18B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NSBCX (0.08). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. NSBCX (-6.84). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NSBCX (17.85).
| FWMMX | NSBCX | FWMMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 0.506 | 883% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.08 | 1,668% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -6.84 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 17.69 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 17.85 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement