Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBCX (6.36B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NSBCX (0.09). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. NSBCX (-3.10). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. NSBCX (18.60).
| FWMMX | NSBCX | FWMMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 0.749 | 510% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.36B | 3,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.09 | 1,652% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -3.10 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 16.88 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 18.60 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement