Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBCX (6.34B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWMMX (1.39) vs NSBCX (0.08). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. NSBCX (-1.62). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.36 vs. NSBCX (19.68).
| FWMMX | NSBCX | FWMMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.996 | 2.012 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.34B | 3,454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.08 | 1,673% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | -1.62 | -430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 15.98 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.36 | 19.68 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement