Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBCX
FWMMX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBCX (6.34B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NSBCX (0.14). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBCX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBCX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. NSBCX (-1.40). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.91 vs. NSBCX (20.23).
| FWMMX | NSBCX | FWMMX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.304 | -0.951 | -137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.34B | 3,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.14 | 952% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -1.40 | -499% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 18.93 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.91 | 20.23 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement