Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBFX
FWMMX vs NSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBFX
FWMMX vs NSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NSBFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBFX (6.18B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NSBFX (1.04). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBFX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBFX (13 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. NSBFX (-5.72). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NSBFX (24.52).
| FWMMX | NSBFX | FWMMX / NSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.61 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.61 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 1.286 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.18B | 3,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.04 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -5.72 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 21.72 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 24.52 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement