Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBFX
FWMMX vs NSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBFX
FWMMX vs NSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBFX (6.36B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NSBFX (1.07). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBFX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBFX (13 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. NSBFX (-1.94). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. NSBFX (25.32).
| FWMMX | NSBFX | FWMMX / NSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.61 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.61 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 1.350 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 6.36B | 3,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.07 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -1.94 | -295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 20.88 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 25.32 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement