Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NSBRX
FWMMX vs NSBRX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NSBRX
FWMMX vs NSBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBRX (6.31B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NSBRX: FWMMX (1.37) vs NSBRX (1.07). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NSBRX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NSBRX (20 years). NSBRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBRX (12.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: FWMMX (250) vs NSBRX (100000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. NSBRX (-2.88). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.94 vs. NSBRX (23.10).
| FWMMX | NSBRX | FWMMX / NSBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.407 | -1.877 | -288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.31B | 3,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.07 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | -2.88 | -386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.19 | 20.79 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.94 | 23.10 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement