Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NWABX
FWMMX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NWABX
FWMMX vs NWABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NWABX (1.54B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FWMMX (1.41) vs NWABX (0.54). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NWABX (8 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FWMMX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. NWABX (-8.51). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. NWABX (-2.99).
| FWMMX | NWABX | FWMMX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 7.837 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.54B | 14,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.54 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -8.51 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 11.90 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -2.99 | -1,024% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers