Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs NWABX
FWMMX vs NWABX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs NWABX
FWMMX vs NWABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. NWABX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and NWABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.73B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than NWABX: FWMMX (1.38) vs NWABX (0.53). FWMMX was incepted earlier than NWABX: FWMMX (6 years) vs NWABX (8 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: FWMMX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. NWABX (-13.35). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. NWABX (-6.48).
| FWMMX | NWABX | FWMMX / NWABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.59 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 6.787 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.73B | 12,587% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.53 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -13.35 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 11.60 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | -6.48 | -462% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers