Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs PCAOX
FWMMX vs PCAOX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs PCAOX
FWMMX vs PCAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. PCAOX (4.01B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than PCAOX: FWMMX (1.41) vs PCAOX (0.07). FWMMX was incepted earlier than PCAOX: FWMMX (6 years) vs PCAOX (16 years). PCAOX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). PCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.80 vs. FWMMX (29.00). PCAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: PCAOX (0) vs FWMMX (250). PCAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. FWMMX (5.72). PCAOX return over 5 years is better than : 42.24 vs. FWMMX (30.58).
| FWMMX | PCAOX | FWMMX / PCAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 10.326 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 4.01B | 5,457% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.07 | 2,116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | 10.56 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 47.88 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 42.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement