Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs PCODX
FWMMX vs PCODX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs PCODX
FWMMX vs PCODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. PCODX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and PCODX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PCODX (10.9B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than PCODX: FWMMX (1.38) vs PCODX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than PCODX: FWMMX (6 years) vs PCODX (30 years). PCODX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). PCODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCODX: FWMMX (250) vs PCODX (2500). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. PCODX (-0.26). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. PCODX (0.54).
| FWMMX | PCODX | FWMMX / PCODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.76 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 8.138 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 10.9B | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -0.26 | -779% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 27.81 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 0.54 | 5,576% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers