Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs POGSX
FWMMX vs POGSX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs POGSX
FWMMX vs POGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. POGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and POGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. POGSX (148M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than POGSX: FWMMX (1.38) vs POGSX (0.20). FWMMX was incepted earlier than POGSX: FWMMX (6 years) vs POGSX (34 years). POGSX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. POGSX (7.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than POGSX: FWMMX (250) vs POGSX (2000). POGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. FWMMX (2.05). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. POGSX (5.26).
| FWMMX | POGSX | FWMMX / POGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.95 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.95 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 11.538 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 148M | 147,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.20 | 682% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 10.14 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 34.06 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 5.26 | 569% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers