Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RDCEX
FWMMX vs RDCEX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RDCEX
FWMMX vs RDCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RDCEX (5.08B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RDCEX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RDCEX (0.00). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RDCEX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RDCEX (23 years). RDCEX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). RDCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). FWMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCEX: FWMMX (250) vs RDCEX (2000). RDCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.33 vs. FWMMX (8.10). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.10 vs. RDCEX (5.09).
| FWMMX | RDCEX | FWMMX / RDCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.69 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.582 | 5.617 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 5.08B | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 9.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.43 | 27.43 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.10 | 5.09 | 591% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement