Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs REQAX
FWMMX vs REQAX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs REQAX
FWMMX vs REQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. REQAX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Hold and REQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQAX (270M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than REQAX: FWMMX (1.38) vs REQAX (0.72). FWMMX was incepted earlier than REQAX: FWMMX (6 years) vs REQAX (18 years). REQAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). REQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). REQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: REQAX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. REQAX (-0.57). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.96 vs. REQAX (-17.55).
| FWMMX | REQAX | FWMMX / REQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.35 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.358 | 9.979 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 270M | 80,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.72 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | -0.57 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.86 | 12.01 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.96 | -17.55 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers