Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs REQCX
FWMMX vs REQCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs REQCX
FWMMX vs REQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. REQCX (272M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than REQCX: FWMMX (1.41) vs REQCX (0.14). FWMMX was incepted earlier than REQCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs REQCX (18 years). REQCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FWMMX (29.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: REQCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. REQCX (-0.40). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. REQCX (-23.96).
| FWMMX | REQCX | FWMMX / REQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.05 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.10 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.822 | 7.167 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 272M | 80,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.14 | 999% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.72 | -0.40 | -1,427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.02 | 3.28 | 884% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | -23.96 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -14.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement