Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs REQCX
FWMMX vs REQCX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs REQCX
FWMMX vs REQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWMMX vs. REQCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWMMX is a Buy and REQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. REQCX (271M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than REQCX: FWMMX (1.38) vs REQCX (0.32). FWMMX was incepted earlier than REQCX: FWMMX (6 years) vs REQCX (18 years). REQCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). REQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FWMMX (32.00). REQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: REQCX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.05 vs. REQCX (-2.66). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.94 vs. REQCX (-23.52).
| FWMMX | REQCX | FWMMX / REQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.05 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.10 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.471 | 8.923 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 271M | 80,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.32 | 428% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | -2.66 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 6.46 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | -23.52 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -11.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers