Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWMMX vs RFNHX
FWMMX vs RFNHX Comparison
Open Charts FWMMX vs RFNHX
FWMMX vs RFNHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RFNHX (183B). FWMMX pays higher dividends than RFNHX: FWMMX (1.37) vs RFNHX (0.73). FWMMX was incepted earlier than RFNHX: FWMMX (6 years) vs RFNHX (11 years). RFNHX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FWMMX (0.35). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RFNHX (26.00). FWMMX (250) and RFNHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFNHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.97 vs. FWMMX (13.06). RFNHX return over 5 years is better than : 45.73 vs. FWMMX (35.40).
| FWMMX | RFNHX | FWMMX / RFNHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.43 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.43 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.639 | 15.011 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 183B | 119% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.73 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 25.97 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.56 | 61.93 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 45.73 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement